Can You Use AI-Generated Images Commercially? (2026)
Can I use AI-generated images commercially?
Yes. The major AI image tools, including ChatGPT, Google Gemini, Midjourney, Adobe Firefly and Canva, allow you to use the images you generate for commercial purposes such as ads, product pages, social posts and merchandise, subject to their terms.
Commercial use is the easy part. The harder questions are whether the image copies something that belongs to someone else, whether you can stop others from copying it, and whether it misleads customers. This guide answers each one as of October 2026, starting with what each tool's terms actually say. Commercial use here means any use that promotes or earns money for a business: ads, packaging, product listings, printed goods and monetized content.
What do ChatGPT, Gemini, Midjourney, Firefly and Canva allow?
Each provider's terms decide what you may do with its outputs. Here is what they say, as of October 2026. Terms change, so re-read them before a large campaign.
| Tool | Who owns the output? | Commercial use | Main conditions |
|---|---|---|---|
| ChatGPT (OpenAI) | You, as between you and OpenAI | Allowed | Output may not be unique; do not present AI output as human-generated |
| Gemini (Google) | Google won't claim ownership | Allowed | You must make sure your content is lawful |
| Midjourney | You, "to the fullest extent possible under applicable law" | Allowed | Companies over $1M yearly revenue need Pro or Mega to own assets; public images can be remixed |
| Adobe Firefly | Not addressed in the FAQ we checked | Allowed for non-beta features | Beta outputs usable unless marked otherwise, but not covered by IP indemnification |
| Canva | You own your Output | Allowed | Canva makes no copyright ownership claim over your Input or Output |
A few details are worth knowing:
- OpenAI assigns you "all our right, title, and interest, if any, in and to Output", but says the assignment does not extend to other users' output. Two businesses can receive very similar images.
- Midjourney grants itself a broad licence to the content you create, and its terms state that "Public Content is remixable by others". If an image is for a client, check whether your plan lets you keep it private.
- Adobe says its Firefly models are trained on content it has rights to use, including Adobe Stock, openly licensed and public domain material. Adobe offers IP indemnification for Firefly outputs mainly to enterprise customers, and its FAQ says beta outputs are not eligible.
- Canva's AI Product Terms, in the November 2025 version, say "you own your Output" and that Canva "makes no copyright ownership claims over your Input or Output".
Do you own AI images you use for your business?
You own them under the tool's contract, but you usually do not hold copyright in them. These are two different things.
The contract settles rights between you and the provider. Copyright decides whether you can stop others from copying. The US Copyright Office's January 2025 report says AI outputs can be protected "only where a human author has determined sufficient expressive elements", and that prompts alone are not enough. The European Parliament's March 2026 resolution takes the same line for content fully generated by AI.
In practice, if a competitor copies your raw AI product shot or illustration, you may have no copyright claim. If you edit, composite and arrange AI elements with your own creative choices, the human parts can be protected. Our guide on whether AI-generated content is copyrighted explains where the line sits.
What can get a commercial AI image in legal trouble?
The tool's terms allow commercial use, but none of them makes an image safe. These are the five risks that matter for businesses.
1. Copyrighted characters and artworks
If you prompt for a famous character, the output can infringe. In June 2025 Disney and Universal sued Midjourney in federal court in Los Angeles, naming characters such as Darth Vader, Elsa, Shrek and the Minions among the images the service produced. Using such an image in your ad adds your own exposure. Avoid character names, film titles and "in the style of" prompts aimed at specific works.
2. Logos, trademarks and watermarks
AI images can contain brand marks. In Getty Images v Stability AI, decided by the UK High Court in November 2025, Getty lost its copyright claims but won narrow trademark findings over Getty and iStock watermarks that appeared in outputs of early Stable Diffusion versions. Check every image for logos, signage, packaging and watermark-like artefacts before you publish.
3. Real people's faces
A realistic image of a real person used to sell something needs their consent. California Civil Code § 3344 makes anyone who knowingly uses another person's name, voice, photograph or likeness for advertising without consent liable for at least $750 or actual damages. US federal trademark law also covers false endorsement, meaning a use "likely to cause confusion" about whether someone sponsors or approves your goods. Read whether AI face swap is legal before using anyone's likeness.
4. Misleading product images
An AI image that shows a product better than it is can be deceptive advertising. The FTC's guidance says there is no blanket ban on AI avatars in marketing, but their use "could also be deceptive in violation of the FTC Act". The same logic applies to product shots: the image must show what the customer will get. AI "customers" with invented testimonials are covered by the FTC's rule on fake reviews, in force since 21 October 2024. See the FTC rules on AI ads, endorsements and reviews.
5. Labelling duties
In the EU, Article 50 of the AI Act has applied since 2 August 2026. Businesses that publish deepfakes, meaning realistic AI images, audio or video that resemble real people, objects, places or events and would falsely appear authentic, must disclose that the content is artificial. An obviously illustrated graphic is not a deepfake; a photorealistic "photo" of a real place or person can be. In New York, ads with an AI-generated "synthetic performer" have needed a clear disclosure since June 2026.
Can you use AI to edit photos you don't own?
Only if you have the right to use the original photo in the first place. AI editing does not clean up the rights in what you upload. Google's terms ask you to make sure you have the necessary rights to any content you upload and that it is lawful, and OpenAI's terms say you retain ownership of your Input, which assumes it was yours to begin with.
This matters in three common situations:
- Stock photos. The licence you bought decides whether and how the photo may be altered and where it may appear. Read it before feeding the photo into an AI tool for an ad.
- Photos found online. Someone else's photo does not become yours because an AI restyled it, especially if the original is still recognisable in the result.
- Customer and influencer photos. Permission to repost is one thing; turning someone's photo into an AI-edited ad is another, and it involves their likeness too.
The safest input is your own material. It also has a copyright upside: the US Copyright Office says that where a human-authored work is perceptible in an AI output, that human contribution can be protected. A product photo you took, then extended or restyled with AI, starts from something that is already yours.
Can you sell AI-generated images or put them on products?
Generally yes, under all five tools' terms, but three limits apply:
- No exclusivity. Outputs may not be unique, and without copyright you may not be able to stop copycats selling the same design.
- Third-party rights still apply. A print of a famous character or a celebrity is no safer because AI made it.
- Marketplace rules. Shops and stock platforms set their own rules on AI content; read them before uploading.
Are AI product photos legal in ads?
Yes, if they are accurate. AI can place products in new scenes, change backgrounds and make lifestyle shots. The legal test is the same as for a photo shoot: the ad must not misrepresent the product's appearance, size, colour, contents or results. Keep the real product photos you started from, so you can show the AI version reflects the actual item. Our guide to AI image generators for business products covers the creative side.
When the image becomes a video, accuracy is harder to keep across frames. BINAI's product video tool turns a few photos of your product into a video ad and checks the label against your photos in every frame, which helps keep the product as it really is.
A checklist before you use an AI image commercially
- Confirm the tool and plan allow commercial use, and note any revenue thresholds or beta labels.
- Look for borrowed elements: characters, artworks, logos, text, watermarks.
- Remove or get consent for real people. Use written releases for anyone recognisable.
- Compare product images with the real product. Fix anything that changes what the customer gets.
- Label realistic synthetic images where the platform or the law requires it.
- Add your own creative work to images you need to protect, and save your files.
- Keep records: the tool, plan, date, prompt and final file for each published image.
BINAI's image and video editor helps with steps 2 and 6: you can cut out, recolour or remove any element, or redo one scene without touching the rest, and the check before you post looks for material used without permission.
This article is general information, not legal advice; for a specific case talk to a lawyer in your country. For the full map of legal questions, see our guide to whether AI-generated content is legal.
Create business images with BINAI
BINAI makes HD images and product videos with models picked for each job, keeps every element editable, and checks each piece before you post. See the tools or start at app.binai.it.
Sources
- OpenAI Terms of Use — OpenAI (text checked via archived copy of the 11 December 2024 version)
- Google Terms of Service — Google
- Midjourney Terms of Service — Midjourney (text checked via tracked copy, Conduct Atlas)
- Adobe Firefly FAQ — Adobe
- How Adobe is indemnifying users from AI-generated imagery legal issues — CMOtech UK
- Canva AI Product Terms — Canva (text checked via What Canva AI's Terms Actually Say, Terms.Law)
- Copyright Office Releases Part 2 of Artificial Intelligence Report — U.S. Copyright Office
- European Parliament resolution on copyright and generative AI — European Audiovisual Observatory (IRIS Merlin)
- Disney and Universal Sue Midjourney Over AI Copyright "Free-Riding" Scheme — The Fashion Law
- Getty Images v Stability AI — Courts and Tribunals Judiciary
- Getty Images v Stability AI case tracker — CMS
- California Civil Code section 3344 — California Public Law
- 15 U.S. Code § 1125 — Cornell Law School LII
- The Consumer Reviews and Testimonials Rule: Questions and Answers — FTC
- AI Act Article 50: Transparency obligations — artificialintelligenceact.eu
- AI Act Article 3: Definitions — artificialintelligenceact.eu
- AI Omnibus adopted: what still applies from August 2 — iubenda
- New York Enacts 'Synthetic Performer' Disclosure Law for Advertisements — Cooley
Frequently asked questions
Can I use ChatGPT-generated images commercially?
Yes. OpenAI's Terms of Use say that, as between you and OpenAI, you own the output and OpenAI assigns you its rights in it, so commercial use is allowed. OpenAI also warns that outputs may not be unique, and its terms forbid presenting AI output as human-generated when it was not.
Can I use Gemini AI images commercially?
Google's Terms of Service say that when its services let you generate original content, Google won't claim ownership over that content. Google also asks you to make sure you have the rights to what you upload and that your content is lawful, so the legal risk of using the image stays with you.
Do I need a paid Midjourney plan to sell images?
Midjourney's terms say you own the assets you create, but a company, or an employee of a company, with more than $1,000,000 a year in revenue must be on a Pro or Mega plan to own them. Images created in public mode can be remixed by other users.
Are Adobe Firefly images safe for commercial use?
Adobe says outputs from Firefly features without the beta label can be used commercially, and beta outputs can too unless marked otherwise, but beta outputs are not eligible for its IP indemnification. Adobe says Firefly models are trained on content it has rights to use, such as Adobe Stock and public domain material.
Can I copyright an AI image I use for my brand?
Usually not the raw image. The US Copyright Office says AI outputs are protected only where a human determined sufficient expressive elements, and prompts alone are not enough. Edit, combine and arrange AI material yourself if you need protection, and consider trademark protection for logos.